https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/issue/feed Monthly Review 2018-12-16T00:25:17-05:00 Monthly Review Archives archives@monthlyreview.org Open Journal Systems <p>This site contains nearly all articles published in <em>Monthly Review</em> since its inception in May 1949. Current subscribers can access content free of charge. Learn more about <em>MR</em>&nbsp;<a title="Monthly Review" href="http://monthlyreview.org/about" target="_self">at the main website</a>.</p> https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-070-07-2018-11_3 Posture Maketh the Man 2018-12-16T00:25:15-05:00 Stephen Jay Gould stephenjaygould@mrsite.org <p>In this article from <em>Ever Since Darwin</em>, Stephen Jay Gould describes how the Museum of Natural History's Gobi Desert expeditions of the 1920s failed to achieve their stated purpose: to find the ancestors of man in Central Asia. In a perceptive analysis of the political role of science and of the social biases that affect thought, Gould describes how anthropologists—despite a complete lack of direct evidence—believed that human evolution was propelled by an enlarging brain, and not, as is the case, upright posture.</p> 2018-12-02T00:00:00-05:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-070-07-2018-11_0 Notes from the Editors, December 2018 2018-12-16T00:25:16-05:00 - The Editors monthlyrevieweditors@mrsite.org <div class="buynow"><a title="Back issue of Monthly Review, December 2018 (Volume 70, Number 7)" href="http://monthlyreview.org/product/mr-070-07-2018-11/">buy this issue</a></div> <p>With the dramatic rise of eco-Marxism in recent years, a corresponding revolution has been taking place in studies of the human-nonhuman animal relationship. Previous critical analyses with respect to the position of animals in human society have been largely dictated by animal-rights discourse, more recently represented by figures such as Peter Singer. Many of these analyses contend that Karl Marx, Marxism, and historical materialism understand the human-nonhuman animal relationship through a dualist, "speciesist," or human-centric, framework—a critique most famously championed by pioneering ecosocialist Ted Benton. This issue is dedicated to analyzing the theoretical propositions underlying Marx's analysis and to demonstrate the antispeciesist and antidualist aspects of his evolutionary-materialist understanding.</p> 2018-12-01T00:00:00-05:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-070-07-2018-11_1 Marx and Alienated Speciesism 2018-12-16T00:25:16-05:00 John Bellamy Foster johnbellamyfoster@mrsite.org Brett Clark brettclark@mrsite.org <p>In many animal-rights circles, Karl Marx and a long tradition of Marxian theorists are to be faulted for their speciesist treatment of nonhuman animals and the human-nonhuman animal relationship. These criticisms typically neglect the larger historical conditions, intellectual influences, and debates out of which Marx's treatment of the human-animal dialectic arose—even though this is crucial to any meaningful understanding of his thought in this area. In response, this article assesses the historical-intellectual background behind Marx's arguments on humans and animals, placing it in the context of the influence exercised on his thought by Epicurus, Hermann Samuel Reimarus, Ludwig Feuerbach, Charles Darwin, and others. In the process, they explain how Marx's view of animals in the world came to be integrated with his theory of metabolic rift and his critique of capitalism.</p> 2018-12-01T00:00:00-05:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-070-07-2018-11_2 On the Origins of Animalist Marxism 2018-12-16T00:25:16-05:00 Christian Stache christianstache@mrsite.org <p>In human-animal studies and critical animal studies, the most influential treatment of animalist Marxism and Marxist animalism has been developed by Ted Benton on the basis of his interpretation of Karl Marx's work. This article focuses minutely on Benton's argument and Marx's <em>Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 </em>(or <em>Paris Manuscripts</em>), refuting Benton's contentions point by point and forcefully challenging the idea that Marx's work was speciesist in orientation.</p> 2018-12-01T00:00:00-05:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-070-07-2018-11_5 The Enigma of China's Growth 2018-12-16T00:25:15-05:00 Zhiming Long zhiminglong@mrsite.org Rémy Herrera remyherrera@mrsite.org <p>China's economic development and success has been widely misunderstood and treated with perplexity. This overview of the Chinese economy provides an analysis of the drivers of the country's growth and crises, including industrialization and the agrarian question.</p> 2018-12-01T00:00:00-05:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-070-07-2018-11_4 #MeToo 2018-12-16T00:25:15-05:00 Wilderness Sarchild wildernesssarchild@mrsite.org <p>An original poem by award-winning writer Wilderness Sarchild.</p> 2018-12-01T00:00:00-05:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-070-06-2018-10_1 Value Isn't Everything 2018-12-16T00:25:16-05:00 John Bellamy Foster johnbellamyfoster@mrsite.org Paul Burkett paulburkett@mrsite.org <p>The rapid advances in Marxian ecology in the last two decades have given rise to extensive debates within the left, reflecting competing conceptions of theory and practice in an age of planetary ecological and social crisis. One key area of dispute is the attempt by a growing number of radical environmental thinkers to deconstruct the labor theory of value in order to bring everything in existence within a single commodity logic. For many in Green circles, Karl Marx and a long tradition of Marxian theorists are to be faulted for not directly incorporating the expenditure of physical work/energy by extra-human nature into the theory of value. In response, this article argues that any form of analysis that seeks to eliminate the deep-seated dialectical contradictions between the natural form and the value form, as well as between the capitalist economy and the larger socioecological metabolism, fails to comprehend the complex, interdependent dialectics of nature and humanity.</p> 2018-11-01T17:14:12-04:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-070-06-2018-10_0 Notes from the Editors, November 2018 2018-12-16T00:25:17-05:00 - The Editors monthlyrevieweditors@mrsite.org <div class="buynow"><a title="Back issue of Monthly Review, November 2018 (Volume 70, Number 6)" href="http://monthlyreview.org/product/mr-070-06-2018-10/">buy this issue</a></div> <p>The twenty-first century has resulted in a vast upsurge of ecological Marxism and ecosocialism more generally, building on the environmental critique of capitalism embedded in classical historical materialism. At the same time, it has also engendered opposing tendencies and approaches concerning how we understand relentless ecological destruction under capitalism. This issue is dedicated to exploring the theoretical advances, schools of thought, and debates on the left in regard to our world's ecological crisis, which threatens the survival of humanity and is inescapable within the present capitalist system of production.</p> 2018-11-01T00:00:00-04:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-070-06-2018-10_3 Renminbi: A Century of Change 2018-12-16T00:25:16-05:00 Sit Tsui sittsui@mrsite.org Qiu Jiansheng qiujiansheng@mrsite.org Yan Xiaohui yanxiaohui@mrsite.org Erebus Wong erebuswong@mrsite.org Wen Tiejun wentiejun@mrsite.org <p>There is considerable interest in the history and characterization of China's economy. This overview of the evolution of the renminbi from the late Qing dynasty to the present, shows how China's political and economic changes in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries are reflected in the development of its highly contested modern currency system.</p> 2018-11-01T00:00:00-04:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-070-06-2018-10_4 Cuba's First Military Doctors 2018-12-16T00:25:16-05:00 Don Fitz donfitz@mrsite.org <p>In the 1960s and the context of mushrooming popular movements across the globe, the brutality of U.S. imperialism, the unreliability of the Soviet Union as an ally, and the Latin American Communist Parties' focus on the urban working class, Cuban leaders felt beckoned to help revolutionary projects in Africa. While Cuba sent soldiers, they also sent doctors. By the end of the 1960s, when the Cuban revolutionary government had been in power for only ten years, doctors had been involved in four different African political projects. Cuba's deployment of military doctors to Africa left profound impacts, both on the host countries and on the Cuban doctors, who were bound to secrecy and only began sharing their stories decades later.</p> 2018-11-01T00:00:00-04:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement##