Is Imperialism Really Necessary? Part II
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-022-06-1970-10_1Keywords:
Imperialism, Political EconomyAbstract
As noted in Part One, the Critics base their interpretation of the current state of U.S. imperialism on what they consider to be the relative smallness of private investment in the underdeveloped world. We have tried to show that the economic involvement is considerably larger than one would infer merely from the statistics on direct foreign private investment. However, one needs to dig deeper. While the relative size of a particular economic sector is important, it is by no means the only consideration. It is necessary to understand the influence of the sector on the dynamics of an economy in motion. For example, the stock market in and of itself is a relatively small part of the U.S. economy. Yet what goes on in the stock market far exceeds its insignificant "statistical" contribution to the gross national product. The availability of this gambling casino is of the very essence of an advanced capitalist system. In addition, speculative fervor on the upside of the market can act as a goad and prop to boom and inflation, while panic among speculators can spark and intensify a major economic decline.This article can also be found at the Monthly Review website, where most recent articles are published in full.
Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website.
Downloads
Published
1970-11-01
Issue
Section
Review of the Month
License
Please see here for reprint requests.